Saturday, July 31, 2010

JSE STALLMAN RECUSES HIMSELF FROM ALL ASPECTS OF CASES--COURI V SIEBERT ET-AL BUT HE SADLY LACKS CANDOR IN DOING SO

JSC STALLMAN ON 7-20-10 SIGNES A 'ORDER' REMOVING HIMSELF FROM THE COURI-SIEBERT CASES.CLEVERLY STALLMAN TAKES A SUMMARY BY JIM ---OUT OF CONTEXT---& CLAIMS THAT JIM DID NOT POINT TO ANY SPECIFIC ACTS OS STALLMAN MANDATING HIS REMOVAL. WE FIND THESE STALLMAN REMARKS AT BEST ---DISINGENUOUS---JUDGE STALLMAN JIM PRODUCED PROOF THAT YOU APPOINTED REFEREES TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY THAT WAS PRECLUDED BY COURT UNIFORM RULES----WHY? ---BECAUSE SIEBERT/BURKE FILED, FORGED & SECRETED FROM JIM & THE COURT A NOTE OF ISSUE----STOPPING ALL POST-NOTE DISCOVERY. YOU TURNED YOUR BACK ON YOUR APPOINTEE REFERSS JACK SUTER'S RAMPANT & CRIMINAL EXPARTE EMAILINGS CONSPIRING WITH JOE BURKE TO ROB JIM COURI'S RIGHTS & WRITE ILLEGAL ORDERS TO GIVE SIEBERT $7MILLION BECAUSE JIM DID NOT ATTEND A DEPOSITION THAT HE KNEW NOTHING ABOUT, THAT WAS STAYED DUE TO JIM'S MOTION TO REMOVE SUTER & THAT WAS BARRED BY UNIFORM RULES OF NY COURTS & THUS ILLEGAL. JSC STALLMAN WHY NOT TELL THE TRUTH AS ALL WILL COME OUT SOON ANYWAY? YOU ARE AWARE THAT BURKE, ALSO DOCUMENTED BY EMAILS, IN FACT WROTE BARRED & ILLEGAL ORDERS THAT WERE IMPLEMENTED BY SUTER & YOU----ALL OF THIS IS IN EVIDENCE----ALL OF THIS & BURKE/SIEBERT'S SPOLIATION ARE CRIMES. HOW CAN YOU STATE THAT THESE ARE NOT EXPLAINED? YOU RECIEVED EMAILS FROM ERIC HUNT TELLING YOU OF THE UNCPVERED CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY BETWEEN BURKE & SUTER BY EXPARTE EMAILS COUGHT BY HUNT'S COMPUTER SYSTEM WHILE JIM WAS IN CALIFORNIA IN HOSPITAL. FURTHER JIM WROTE YOU A EMAIL DETALIING WITH THE EMALE EVIDENCE OF THE CONSPIRACY & FRAUDS ENGAGED IN BY SUTER & BURKE. FINALLY YOUR DECISIONS BLAMING JIM FOR ACTS THAT WERE ENGAGED IN & DOCUMENTED BY SIEBERT/BURKE WERE TRANSPARENT INCLUDING THE TURN OVER OF HIPAA FORMS IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL HIPAA LAWS & PATIENT RIGHTS. IN A NUTSHELL & WELL DOCUMENTED IN THE COURT FILES ARE PROOF POSITIVE YOU IGNORED CRIMINAL CONDUCT OF BURKE & SUTER WHICH YOU SHOULD HAVE REFERRED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT---IE MISUSE OF EMAILS TO CONSPIRE TO & DID COMMIT FRAUD ON JIM & THE COURTS OF NEW YORK---IF YOU WISH PLEASE REVIEW YOUR EMAILS & RELEVANT COURT FILES AS YOUR 7-20-10 FOUNDATION FOR YOUR RECUSAL IS INCOMPLETE AND SHOCKING AS TO ITS ATTEMPTED 'WHITE-WASH'----SEE SCAMRAIDERS