INTENTIONAL VIOLATIONS OF A MAJOR INJUNCTION----JOSEPH M BURKE ESQ AND JOHN SIEBERT MD CON AND DEFRAUD 4UNIFIED COURT JUDGES AND 4 UNIFIED COURT REFEREES BY SECRETING AND DISOBEYING A BROAD AND SWEEPING INJUNCTION ISSUED BH JUDGE HAHOLD BEELER ON 12-12-2005 ORDERING AND MANDATING THAT ALL PARTIES IN THE JIM COURI VS JOHN SIEBERT AND SIEBERT MD PC ARE ENJOINED FROM MAKING ANY MOTIONS OR FILING ANY CASES INCLUDING JOSEPH M BURKE WITHOUT FIRSE OBTAINING PERMISSION BY TELEPHONIC CONFRENCE CALL WITH THE COURT AND WITH ALL PARTIES ON THE LINE. UNDAUNTED BURKE AND SIEBERT IGNORING THE INJUNCTION SECRETED IT AFTER BEELER RESIGNED THE COURT, REFUSED AND FAILED TO DISCLOSE THE INJUNCTION AND THEREAFTER DEFRAUDED 3 OTHER JUDGES AND DEFRAUDED THE APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPT. THEY WERE ILLEGALLY REWARDED BY THE ISSUANCE OF DECISIONS AND ORDERS ARISING OUT OF ILLEGAL MOTIONS ALL OF WHICH MUST AS A MATTER OF LAW BE VACATED, SET ASIDE AND EXPUNGED AS VIOLATIVE OF THE INJUNCTION AND BURKE AND SIEBERT MUST BE HELD IN CONTEMPT----JIM COURI IN FACT SAUGHT AND OBTAINED PERMISSION TO BRING ANOTHER CASE AGAINST SIEBERT AND PREVAILED. JOSEPH M BURKE A LAWYER COMMITTED INTENTIONAL FRAUD ON 4 JUDGES AND 4 REFEREES OBTAINING ILLEGAL AND BARRED DECISIONS ISSUED BY JUDGES AND REFEREES AND APPELLATE COURTS WHO WERE CLUELESS AS TO THE INJUNCTION. BURKE'S AND SIEBERT'S ACTS CONSTITUTE CONTEMPT, FRAUD AND INTENTIONAL SURPRESSION OF A MATERIAL INJUNCTION WHILE THEY OBTAINED UNJUST AND ILLEGAL REWARDS WHILE JIM COURI WAS UNDERGOING CANCER AND CARDIAC SURGERY. THE INTENTIONAL VIOLATION OF A INJUNCTION SHOULD HAVE GRAVE CONSEQUENCES FOR A LAWYER'S INTENTIONAL FLOUTING OF IT AND HIS PERJURY AND FRAUD ON THE COURT AND A ILL PRO-SE LITIGANT--MORE FODDER FOR RICO AND THE FEDERAL COURTS---WE ARE WAITING FOR MORE EVIDENCE BEING DEVELOPED DAILY---STAY TUNED--